0f758cb668
Both themes used bg_terminal, on the assumption the name meant "the terminal's background". It does not -- the shared Theme struct documents it as "For terminal output blocks (currently unused, using bg_dark instead)". The surface grok actually paints is bg_base, so GrokDay was rendering brighter than grok itself (#f5f5f5 vs #eeeeee) and GrokNight darker (#0a0a0a vs #141414). GrokDay's color15 moves from bg_storm to bg (#f5f5f5): bg_storm is now the background, so bright white would have been invisible against it. Audited every slot in both files against the source palettes: each value maps to a named palette color, no text color is under 3:1 on its background, and cursor and selection overlays clear 4.5:1. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| atuin | ||
| bat | ||
| helix | ||
| kitty | ||
| nvim | ||
| opencode | ||
| private_fish | ||
| private_karabiner/private_assets/private_complex_modifications | ||
| scripts | ||
| wezterm | ||
| karabiner.edn | ||